Hyppää sisältöön
 
    • Suomeksi
    • På svenska
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • På svenska
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Taju etusivu
  • Taideyliopisto
  • Rinnakkaistallennetut julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Taju etusivu
  • Taideyliopisto
  • Rinnakkaistallennetut julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Appreciating situations of breakdown for researcher reflexivity

Treacy, Danielle (2022)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Treacy_Appreciating_situations_of_breakdown_for_researcher_reflexivity_Final_draft.pdf (313.1Kt)
Lataukset: 

Treacy, Danielle
SAGE
2022

1741-2617

Treacy, D. (2022). Appreciating situations of breakdown for researcher reflexivity. Action Research. © 2022 Danielle Treacy. https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503211073083


lehtiartikkeli

doi:10.1177/14767503211073083
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2022022520802
Tiivistelmä
Responding to the identified need for reflection, critique, and evaluations of appreciative inquiry (AI), a form of action research, this article presents a critical reflection on an application of AI in a cross-cultural music education research project. AI was selected as it appeared to both have potential for addressing the complexities related to power imbalances, ethnocentrism, and coloniality inherent in a project aiming to co-develop music teacher education in Finland and Nepal, and because its 4D model supported the co-constructing of visions, which was central to the project. The critical reflection presented in this article focused on three situations of breakdown that occurred during the research process. Analysis of these breakdowns highlighted the need for researchers to engage responsibly in research as participants, account for dreaming as an unevenly distributed capacity when working with visions or aspirations, and develop skills facilitating collaborative spaces that cultivate listening for and appreciating difference. The article concludes by recognising the limitations of undertaking this reflection independently rather than collaboratively and by cautioning against the instrumentalization of appreciation, calling instead for sincere appreciation. Overall, the article contends that the process of identifying and generating new understandings of breakdowns is a powerful approach for stimulating researcher reflexivity.
Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallennetut julkaisut [177]
Taideyliopisto
PL 1, 00097 Taideyliopisto
Tietosuoja
lib@uniarts.fi | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetJulkaisusarjat ja lehdetOrganisaatioyksikötOppiaineetAsiasanatJulkaisuajatSivukartta

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Taideyliopisto
PL 1, 00097 Taideyliopisto
Tietosuoja
lib@uniarts.fi | Saavutettavuusseloste