Aesthetics, de-aestheticisation, abstraction : reflections on the philosophy of art after the avant-garde and conceptualism
Taideyliopiston Kuvataideakatemia
2025
kirja
Pysyvä osoite
Verkkojulkaisu
Sisällysluettelo
Abstract
Tiivistelmä
Abstrakt
Acknowledgements
Introduction
Part I. Aesthetics
Introduction
The Beginning of Aesthetics: Baumgarten’s ‘Science of the Sensuous’
Aesthetics as Philosophical Science on Pure Forms of Intuition: the ‘Transcendental Aesthetics’ of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason Aesthetics as Philosophical Critique of Taste and Sensibility: Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgement
Aesthetics as a ‘Mere Name’ for Art Theory: Hegel’s Philosophy of Fine Art
Concluding Remarks
Part II. De-Aestheticisation
Introductory Remarks
Introduction
De-Aestheticisation as the Heir to Jena Romanticism: Peter Osborne on the Premises of Conceptual Art in German Philosophy
Critical Remarks on Osborne’s Theory from the Standpoint of Hegel’s Critique of the Jena Romanticists’ Philosophical Aestheticism
Either Art or the Aesthetic: Keti Chukhrov on the ‘Aesthetic Schism’ in Modern Art Theory
Critical Remarks on the Ideologisation of the Contra- and Pro-Aesthetic Positions
The Revision of Kantian Aesthetics in Postmodern Art Theory: Thierry de Duve’s Re-Aestheticisation of Readymade
The Avant-Garde’s Attack on the Institution of Art, and its Impact on Art and the Aesthetic: Peter Bürger’s Theory of the Avant-Garde
Critical Remarks on Duve’s Theory from the Standpoint of Bürger. Preliminary Theoretical Conclusion
The Neo-Avant-Garde and the ‘Sublation of the Aesthetic’: the Viewpoint of Art Praxis
Remarks on Distinguishing the Aesthetic from the Artistic in the Institutional Theory of Art
Concluding Remarks
Part III. Abstraction
Introduction. The Question of Abstraction: the Relation of Art to Life Praxis
Abstract Art in Terms of Form and Content
Abstract or Still Representational: ‘New Painterly Realism’, the ‘Fourth Dimension’ and the ‘Spiritual’
Abstract Art as ‘Presentation of the Unpresentable’: Jean-François Lyotard’s Conception of ‘Sublime Painting’
Robert Pippin: Abstract Art as Part of the Development of the Human Self-Consciousness in History
Conclusion
Introductory Remarks
On a Work of Art
On Split Personality, Theft, and Freedom
On the Stupidity of the Artist and the Truth of Art
References.
Tiivistelmä
Art theory is not an explanation of art, but rather its highest implementation. This Hegelian thought seems more an expression of the desirable than a description of the real when it comes to contemporary art: neither post-Kantian and phenomenological approaches, nor the various cultural and visual studies that have dominated the field in recent decades, have demonstrated their suitability for dealing with anything other than the representational and sensible aspects of today’s art. Proceeding from the hypothesis that the crux of the matter lies in the under-researched tension between German aesthetics and the ‘anti-artistic’, ‘de-aestheticising’ and ‘radical abstraction’ programmes of the avant-garde and Conceptual art, this study seeks to contribute to the development of a philosophical discourse that is capable of engaging with contemporary art in its ontological aspect.
ISBN
978-952-353-495-7
Aihealue
OKM-julkaisutyyppi
Emojulkaisu
Lehti
Julkaisusarja
ISSN
DOI
Kuvaus
This publication presents the Theory volume of Ilya Orlov’s doctoral dissertation Aesthetics, De-Aestheticisation, Abstraction, and Five Efforts in Themes and Methods. The full version of the thesis, including all the written components and the image documentation of the artworks, can be accessed in the publications archive Taju.
Saavutettavuusominaisuudet
Ei tietoa saavutettavuudesta
Avainsanat
taideestetiikkakuvataidetaidefilosofiaavantgardeteoriattaideteoksettaideteoriatnykytaidekonseptualismitaidekäsityksetontologia (filosofia)taiteellinen tutkimusartphilosophy of arttheoriestheories of artaestheticsworks of artfine artscontemporary artavant-gardeconceptualismartistic workconceptions of artontology (philosophy)artistic research